Lifelong Learn. 2022, 12, 119-146

Skills of PhD Graduates for Open Science and Open Innovation

Michal Janíčko1, Zdeňka Šímová1, Denise McGrath2,3

1Národní vzdělávací fond, o.p.s., Opletalova 25, 110 00 Praha 1, Česká republika
2School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, 4 Stillorgan Rd, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
3The Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Received August 18, 2022
Accepted October 19, 2022


1. Ali-Khan, S., Jean, A. & McDonald, E. (2018). Defining Success in Open Science. MNI Open Research. <>
2. Bogers, M. et al. (2016). The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes across Different Levels of Analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40. <>
3. Boman, J. et al. (2021). What Comes after a PhD? Findings from the DocEnhance Survey of Doctorate Holders on Their Employment Situation, Skills match, and the Value of the Doctorate. DocEnhance. Available from:
4. Bosch, G. (2018). Train PhD Students to be Thinkers not Specialists. Nature 554, 277. Available from: <>
5. Carayannis, E., Barth, T. & Campbell, D. (2012). The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as a Challenge and Driver for Innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 1(2), 1–12. <>
6. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Chesbrough, H. & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation. In: Chesbrough, H, Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (eds.): New Frontiers in Open Innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Chung, W. C. (2019). The Praxis of Product Design in Collaboration with Engineering. New York: Springer.
9. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-industrygovernment Relations. Research Policy. 29(2), 109–123.
10. Eurostat (2021). R&D Personnel by Sector of Performance, Professional Position and Sex (dataset [rd_p_persocc]).
11. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M. & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
12. Hnátková, E. et al. (2022). Labour Market Perspectives for PhD Graduates in Europe. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 395–409. <>
13. James Jacob, W. (2015). Interdisciplinary Trends in Higher Education. Palgrave Communications, 1.
14. Kosová, B. et al. (2019). Doktorandská škola. Cesta k transformácii a inovácii doktorandského vzdelávania vo svete a na Slovensku. Banská Bystrica: Belianum.
15. Ledford, H. (2015). How to Solve the World’s Biggest Problems. Nature, 525, 308–311. <>
16. Mountford, N. et al. (2020). Interdisciplinary Doctoral Research Networks: Enhancers and Inhibitors of Social Capital Development. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2558–2573. <>
17. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017). Building America’s Skilled Technical Workforce. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
18. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2019). Employment Sector of Doctorate Recipients with Definite Postgraduation Commitments for Employment in the United States, by Broad Field of Study: Selected Years, 1998–2018 (dataset, Table 46). Available from:
19. OECD (2021). Education at a Glance. Share of Population by Educational Attainment (dataset). Available from:
20. Reichert, S. (2019). The Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Brussels: European University Association, 2019.
21. Stokols, D. (2018). Social Ecology in the Digital Age – Solving Complex Problems in a Globalised World. Cambridge MA: Academic Press.
front cover

ISSN 1804-526X (Print) ISSN 1805-8868 (Online)