Lifelong Learn. 2018, 8, 48-75
https://doi.org/10.11118/lifele2018080348
Primary and Lower Secondary School Teachers and the Development of Their Attitudes towards the Curriculum Reform: Three Stories
References
1. , I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58.
<https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27>
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (s. 173–222). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. , D. R. (1998). A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. System, 26(3), 353–368.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00023-2>
4. , D., Starý, K., & Urbánek, P. (2015). Malá škola po pěti letech: proměny školy v době reformy. Pedagogická orientace, 25(1), 9–31.
<https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2015-1-9>
5. Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (s. 79–124). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. , Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1859–1875.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.007>
7. Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (2005). The influence of beliefs and goals on attitude: issues of structure, function, and dynamics. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (s. 323–368). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. , J. (2015). Tvorba případových studií pro výzkumné účely. Pedagogika, 65(2), 113–142.
9. Pešková, K., Janko, T., Janík, T., Spurná, M. (2018). Proměny postojů učitelů ke kurikulární reformě a jejímu zavádění. Orbis scholae (v tisku).
10. Píšová, M., Kostková, K., Janík, T., & Vlček, P. (2011). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích: případové studie tvorby kurikula. Praha: VÚP.
11. Píšová, M., Kostková, K., & Vlček, P. (2011). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích: případové studie. In Janík, T., Knecht, P., & Šebestová, S. (Eds.), Smíšený design v pedagogickém výzkumu: sborník příspěvků z 19. výroční konference České asociace pedagogického výzkumu (s. 24–30). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
12. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubugue: Brown.
13. , J. P., Matos, J. F., Guimarães, H. M., Leal, L. C., & Canavarro, A. P. (1994). Teachers’ and students’ views and attitudes towards a new mathematics curriculum: a case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(4), 347–365.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279520>
14. , J. M. (2007). An uncertain harvest: a case study of implementation of innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(1), 97–121.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500532448>
15. Street, Ch., & Ward, K. (2010). Retrospective case study. In Mills, A., Durepos, G., Wiebe, E., & Pagano, M. P. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (s. 824–827). Communication Faculty Book Gallery.
16. , G. (2011). A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science Following a Review of Definition, Discourse, and Structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511–521.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409884>
17. , K. van, & Sleegers, P. (2006). How does it feel? Teachers’ emotions in a context of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 85–111.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500109304>
18. , G., Kimonen, E., Nevalainen, R., & Webb, R. (1997). Teacher identity and curriculum change: a comparative case-study analysis of small school in England and Finland. Comparative Education, 33(1), 97–115.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069728668>
19. , C., & He, C. (2012). Bridging the implementation gap: an ethnographic study of English teachers’ (implementation of the curriculum reform in China). Ethnography and Education, 7(1), 1–19.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2012.661585>
20. Yin, K. R. (2009). Case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
